RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Ranjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Permanent Lok Adalat – Respondent
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
This petition is directed against the order dated 15.02.2016 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat (PUS), Sirsa (hereinafter referred to as the "Lok Adalat"), dismissing an application filed by the petitioner under Section 22-C of Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act of 1987"), for settlement of dispute of Insurance Policy No.0100924327 and Claim No.620775590 set up by the petitioner.
2. In brief, the petitioner had purchased Mahindra & Mahindra Scorpio vehicle on 25.02.2014 bearing temporary registration No.HR99PM/2744. The vehicle was insured w.e.f. 14.02.2014 to 13.02.2015 by respondent No.2. The vehicle was alleged to have been stolen on the intervening night of 26/27.04.2014. The petitioner lodged a formal FIR No.427 dated 05.05.2014, under Section 379 IPC against the unknown person. Admittedly, the permanent registration No.HR-24P/5756 was obtained on 14.05.2014. The Lok Adalat dismissed the application of the petitioner on the ground that as per Section 43(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), the temporary registration of the vehicle is valid only for a period of one month an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.