SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1883

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Natasha Sood – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Puneet Gupta
For the Respondent:J.S. Toor, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

The petitioner was a bachelor girl when she was married to respondent No. 7 on 25.03.2014, who had a daughter, aged about 14 years, and a son of 8 years from his first marriage. The petitioner was a Teacher in a private school at Panchkula. She was relieved from her job on 04.02.2015 because she did not qualify the Teachers Eligibility Test. From the date of her marriage, she has been living in her matrimonial home bearing House No. 1512, First Floor, PUSHPAC Society, Sector 49-B, Chandigarh along with her husband, two children, mother-in-law and father-in-law, who are also arrayed as respondents No. 5 and 6 in this petition.

2. The petitioner was allegedly tormented by respondents No. 5 to 7 for bringing less dowry and was deprived her of basic needs, therefore, she filed a complaint on 07.07.2014, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act of 2005"). She also filed an application on the same day under Section 23 of the Act of 2005 for interim relief. The application was contested by respondents No. 5 to 7 with their separate replies. The interim application filed by the petitioner















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top