RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Natasha Sood – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
The petitioner was a bachelor girl when she was married to respondent No. 7 on 25.03.2014, who had a daughter, aged about 14 years, and a son of 8 years from his first marriage. The petitioner was a Teacher in a private school at Panchkula. She was relieved from her job on 04.02.2015 because she did not qualify the Teachers Eligibility Test. From the date of her marriage, she has been living in her matrimonial home bearing House No. 1512, First Floor, PUSHPAC Society, Sector 49-B, Chandigarh along with her husband, two children, mother-in-law and father-in-law, who are also arrayed as respondents No. 5 and 6 in this petition.
2. The petitioner was allegedly tormented by respondents No. 5 to 7 for bringing less dowry and was deprived her of basic needs, therefore, she filed a complaint on 07.07.2014, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act of 2005"). She also filed an application on the same day under Section 23 of the Act of 2005 for interim relief. The application was contested by respondents No. 5 to 7 with their separate replies. The interim application filed by the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.