Back
JAISHREE THAKUR
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Javitri Devi – Respondent
The legal document you provided appears to be a detailed judgment from a High Court case involving family law, maintenance, and pension attachment issues. However, the document itself does not include a direct link or reference to an SCC (Supreme Court Cases) PDF of this judgment.
Since the judgment is from a High Court and not the Supreme Court, it is unlikely that an SCC PDF exists for this specific case. Typically, SCC PDFs are available for Supreme Court decisions.
If you are specifically looking for a PDF of this judgment, I recommend the following steps: - Visit the official website of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana to search for the case using the case number or parties involved. - Check legal databases such as Indian Kanoon, Manupatra, or Judis, which often host judgments from various courts and may provide PDF downloads. - If you need a formal SCC PDF, clarify whether you are seeking a Supreme Court judgment related to similar issues, as this case appears to be from a High Court.
Please specify if you need assistance in locating judgments on similar legal principles or how to access legal databases for court judgments.
Jaishree Thakur, J.
Crl. Misc. 22247 of 2017--For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 48 days in filing the revision is condoned.
Main case
1. The petitioner herein seeks to challenge order dated 3.3.2017 passed by the District Judge, Family Court, Karnal, by which a application for interim maintenance filed by the respondent has been allowed and the respondent has been granted interim maintenance of Rs. 4,000 per month from the date of filing of the petition along with litigation expenses. In brief, the facts are, that the petitioner and the respondent solemnized a marriage around forty years ago and out of this wedlock a female child was born. After the respondent was turned out of her matrimonial home, she started to reside with her daughter in Karnal. Having no source of income, she filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') seeking maintenance, along with an application for interim maintenance. The respondent-wife alleged that she has no source of income, whereas the petitioner has retired from HUDA and has a pension, hence she would be entitled to receive maintenance. The petitioner contested the matter stati
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
