Jaishree Thakur, J.

The challenge in the instant petition, filed under Section 482Cr.P.C., is to the order dated 07.03.2017 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram, whereby an application dated 28.11.2016 (Annexure P-2), filed by respondent No. 1 Radhika Sibal, has been allowed thereby impleading her as a respondent in a complaint case filed under section 12 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short 'Act of 2005') by the petitioner herein against her husband Mickey Sibal-respondent No. 2.

2. To understand the controversy that has arisen in the instant case and to determine whether or not the JMIC, Gurugram has erred in allowing impleadment application filed by respondent No. 1 Radhika Sibal in a complaint case filed under Section 12 of the Act of 2005 by the petitioner against her husband, a few facts need to be noticed. The petitioner and respondent No. 2 allegedly solemnized their marriage on 05.10.2013 as per Sikh rites and customs at 218/B, Tower 2, 18th Floor, Magnolias DLF Phase-V, Gurugram, which apartment was owned by and in possession of respondent No. 2. Both the petitioner and respondent No. 2, started l