SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1868

KULDIP SINGH
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Puri – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.S. Dhull

JUDGMENT :

Kuldip Singh, J.

C.M. No. 21708-CII of 2010

For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 41 days in filing the present appeal is condoned subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

F.A.O. No. 5006 of 2010

1. Challenged in the present appeal is the Award dated 30.03.2010 passed under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (in short 'the M.V. Act') by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Adhoc), Patiala (in short 'the Tribunal'), vide which the claimants-respondent Nos. 1 to 4 were awarded compensation to the tune of Rs. 2,40,000/- (Rupees two lacs forty thousand only) along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization on account of death of Inderjeet Singh. The brief facts of the case are that on 10.03.2008, Inderjit Singh was going from his dhaba to his village Beer Bahadurgarh on his motorcycle bearing registration No. PB-11T-3888. The motorcycle was owned by his son Vakil Singh-respondent No. 1. Harphool Singh, brother of Inderjit Singh was sitting on the pillion of the zaid motorcycle, which was being followed by Bahadur Singh on his separate motorcycle. When they reached near village Dhindsa on Rajp









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top