SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1063

MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Brahamjeet @ Bhola – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Vashisth
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikas Malik

JUDGMENT :

Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.176 dated 16.10.2017, registered under Sections 148, 149, 307, 323, 506 of the Indian Penal Code & Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Tigaon, District Faridabad.

2. It is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2018 and except Ninder and Bittu, all other co-accused have either been released on regular bail or granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. It is further contended that there is a cross-case also registered at the instance of the petitioner against the complainant side.

3. On the other hand, learned State Counsel, on instructions from S.I. Satpal Singh, has opposed the bail application by contending that a 'Danda' has been recovered from the petitioner, but he has conceded that the allegations under Section 307, IPC are against co-accused Ninder and Bittu and not against the petitioner.

4. Since there is a cross-case registered by the petitioner against the complainant side regarding the same very occurrence i.e. FIR No.17



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top