SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1072

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Charanjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Karan Garg
For the State : Mr. Hittan Nehra

JUDGMENT :

Daya Chaudhary, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to petitioner-Charanjit Kaur in case FIR No. 176 dated 29.12.2017 registered under Sections 22/61/85 of NDPS Act at Police Station Phul, District Bathinda.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case, whereas, no offence is made out against her. Learned counsel further contends that the petitioner is not habitual offender as she is not involved in any other case of similar nature. The alleged recovery does not fall under the category of manufactured drug and provisions of NDPS Act are not attracted. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioner is in custody for the last more than six months and recovery has already been effected. At the end, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even as per allegations, the recovery is 800 tablets of Alprazolam and the same is marginally more than the non-commercial quantity.

3. Learned State counsel has opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that the recovery comes to 101 miligrams, which falls under the commercial q




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top