SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1120

B.S.WALIA
Pallavi – Appellant
Versus
Nand Kishor alias Naveen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mukesh Rao, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

B.S.WALIA, J.

1. Challenge is to order dated 05.12.2016 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court-I, Faridabad, dismissing the petitioner mother’s prayer for interim custody of minor child Rudransh during the pendency of application under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1890 Act).

2. Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of the instant petition are that an application was moved by the petitioner before the learned District Judge, Family Court-I, Faridabad, with the averments that she was married to the respondent on 25.02.2012, that male twins, Ranvijay and Rudransh were born out of the wedlock on 27.12.2013, but that she and her son Ranvijay who was not keeping well were turned out from the matrimonial home by the respondent and his parents on 07.03.2015 though Rudransh was kept by the respondent and his parents, that she had got Ranvijay treated from Escorts Hospital as well as Sir Gangaram Hospital by spending a huge amount and during said period, neither the respondent nor his parents supported her or Ranvijay, emotionally or financially, that the respondent is not in a position to take car
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top