SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1162

MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Neeraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Arav Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikas Malik, D.A.G.,

JUDGMENT :

MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J.

1. This petition for grant of regular bail has been filed by petitioner – Neeraj an accused in FIR No.222 dated 4.3.2018 for offence under Sections 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('NDPS' – for short) registered with Police Station City Thasar, District Kurukshetra.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for granting interim bail to the petitioner for the reason that the report from Chemical Examiner has not been received so far.

3. The above factual aspect of the matter regarding FSL report has not been disputed by learned State counsel.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has cited the Division Bench judgment of this Court i.e. Inderjeet Singh @ Laddi and others Versus State of Punjab, 2014(3) RCR (Criminal) 953 in support of his contention that in such an eventuality interim bail is to be granted to the accused.

5. Under the above circumstances and keeping in view the ratio of the above judgment, the petitioner be released on interim bail till the receipt of FSL report subject to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. It is clarified that the interim bail will come to an


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top