FATEH DEEP SINGH
Naranjan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
FATEH DEEP SINGH, J.
Since all these regular second appeals, as detailed above, though by different sets of plaintiffs/appellants but have been filed against same set of respondents wherein similar facts are pleaded on similar cause of action and therefore involving common question of law and facts, for the sake of brevity are being taken up and disposed off together through this common judgment. The facts have been drawn from
RSA No.3962 of 2012.
2. The brief facts that needs to be enumerated are that all the plaintiffs have filed separate suits for declaration to the effect that the they were owners in possession being proprietors (khewatdar) of village Dirba over respective suit properties comprising of residential premises which form part of the land detailed, described and depicted in the headnote of the plaint, situated in the revenue estate of village Dirba, Tehsil Sunam, District Sangrur as per the revenue record alleging that the defendants have no concern with the suit property as they are neither owners nor in possession of any part of the same. The plaintiffs further challenged mutation order No.7455/B dated 15.12.1998 passed by the then Assistant Collector Grade
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.