SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1479

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Payal Bhola – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate, Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Suveer Sheokand, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.

1. This order shall dispose of FAO Nos.3603 of 2013 and Cross Objection No.31-CII of 2014 titled as National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Payal Bhola and others and FAO No. 3797 of 2013 titled as Ravinder Singh Vs. Payal Bhola and others as these matters arise out of the award dated 26.03.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ludhiana.

2. FAO No.3603 of 2013 has been preferred by the National Insurance Company Limited and cross objections have been filed by the claimants. The only question raised in these two matters is with regard to quantum of compensation.

3. Briefly, it may be noticed that the claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act by the widow and two minor children of deceased Vishal Bhola who is stated to have died in a motor vehicle accident on 12.04.2011. It was averred in the claim petition that Vishal Bhola (since deceased) and who was working with Sandhu Automobiles had gone to Stan Auto, G.T.Road, Ludhiana on 12.04.2011 to explore better job prospects. It was stated that while he was stan























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top