SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1507

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Naib Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ranjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. Arguments were heard at length and the judgment was pronounced. Now the Court proceed to record its reasons.

2. Plaintiff-appellant is in the regular second appeal against the judgment passed by the learned First Appellate Court reversing the judgment passed by the learned trial Court while deciding a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell.

3. In the considered opinion of this Court, following substantial question of law arises for consideration:-

(i) whether marginal witnesses are required to know terms of the contract entered into between the parties and they must necessarily witness the payment of the amount under the contract, failing which their evidence cannot be relied upon ?

4. Plaintiff filed a suit on the basis of a written agreement to sell dated 07.02.2008 entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant with respect to land measuring 8 kanals and 16 marlas at the rate of Rs.9,00,000/- per acre and received a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as earnest money. As per the agreement, sale deed was to be executed and registered on 11.05.2008. Plaintiff further pleaded that he had sent notice to the defendant to come and execute the sale d






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top