AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, REKHA MITTAL
Satish – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.
In this petition filed under Articles 226 /227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the order dated 19.12.2014 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent No. 1. Further, a writ of mandamus has been sought directing the respondents to re-determine the compensation under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short "the Act") qua the land of the petitioners and to award compensation @ Rs. 4 per square yard for the entire land along with all statutory benefits.
2. A few facts necessary for adjudication of the present petition as narrated therein may be noticed. The petitioners/their predecessors were the owners in possession of the land situated within the revenue estate of village Ganaur, District Sonepat. Government of Haryana vide notification dated 31.12.1962 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short "the Act") followed by notification dated 1.1.1963 under Section 6 of the Act acquired the said land including the land of the petitioners for Bharat Steel Tube Factory. The award was passed on 30.4.1963. Some of the landowners, filed re
Government of Andhra Pradesh and Another Vs. B. Satyanarayana Rao (Dead) by Lrs. and Others
Jai Singh and Others Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Sundeep Kumar Bafna Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
Union of India (UOI) and Others Vs. Karnail Singh and Others
Union of India (UOI) and Another Vs. Raghubir Singh (Dead) by Lrs. Etc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.