SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2398

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Harjinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Gagandeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ashish Aggarwal

JUDGMENT :

Daya Chaudhary, J.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 12.10.2016 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Additional District Judge, Tarn Taran, whereby, the application filed by the petitioners for modification of award dated 13.10.2014 has been dismissed.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case, as made out in the petition, are that husband of petitioner No.1, namely, Mangal Singh and father of petitioners No.2 to 4 died in a road accident on 09.09.2011, when he was coming back to his house, the offending vehicle i.e. truck bearing No.RJ-14-GB-8927, which was being driven by respondent No.1, struck with motorcycle from its back. An FIR No.195 dated 10.09.2011 was registered against respondent No.1 under Sections 304-A, 279, 427 and 338 IPC. Petitioner no.1, being widow and minor children of deceased Mangal Singh, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the owner, driver and insurer of the offending vehicle before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (here-in-after referred to as the 'MACT'), Tarn Taran. Vide award dated 13.10.2014, a compensation amounting t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top