Daya Chaudhary, J.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge impugned order dated 06.05.2016 (Annexure P-5) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hoshiarpur, whereby, the application moved by the petitioner-defendant under Sections 10 and 11 CPC was dismissed as well as order dated 09.11.2016 (Annexure P-7) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hoshiarpur, whereby, the application filed by the petitioner-defendant for review of order dated 06.05.2016 was also dismissed.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case as made out in the present revision petition are that the respondents-plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration to the effect that they being tenant are in possession of the land in dispute and also for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner-defendant from interfering in their peaceful possession. The suit was contested by the present petitioner-defendant by specifically stating that respondent No.2 was not the owner of property in dispute as he never purchased the same. The execution of pattanama was also denied by the petitioner-defendant. Respondent No.1 filed an application for correction in kha