M.M.S. Bedi, J.

Through instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 13.10.2016, Annexure P-1, passed by the Central Information Commissioner, New Delhi claiming that prayer of the petitioner for providing complete and genuine information sought by the petitioner under the Right to Information Act, 2005 and for launching an action against the officials of Oriental Bank of Commerce, has not been considered.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the petitioner himself who is present in the Court.

3. Unfortunately, the petitioner has been dismissed in December, 2014 while he was working as a Senior Manager in Amritsar Branch of the Oriental Bank of Commerce. It is not disputed that the petitioner has filed more than 200 RTI applications and over 250 complaints to the authorities in the capacity as a whistle blower so as to expose the corruption/irregularities in the same Bank from which Bank he has been dismissed. His writ petition against the dismissal order, is pending.

4. The contents of his 13 complaints which were brought to the notice of Central Information Commissioner, New Delhi, have been referred to in the order. It is not out of