SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2401

S.S.SARON, ARUN PALLI, LISA GILL
Attar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Rohtak Division – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mahavir Sandhu, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Randhir Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana, S.P. Chahar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

S.S. SARON, J.

1. The petitioner Attar Singh filed CWP No.19364 of 2001 for himself being a `biswedar' and also on behalf of other proprietors of village Kiloli, Tehsil and District Jhajjar in terms of Order 1, Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking quashing of the order dated 12.11.1999 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Jhajjar (respondent No.3), order dated 17.07.2000 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Collector, Jhajjar (respondent No.2) and order dated 25.10.2001 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak (respondent No.1); besides, mutation No.409 dated 28.12.1954 (Annexure P-2) was also assailed.

2. The petitioner has placed on record Jamabandi for the year 1950-51 (Annexure P-1) in respect of land measuring 1215 bighas 16 biswas in village Kiloli, Tehsil Jhajjar, District Rohtak, which is subject matter of dispute in the present case. The ownership of the said land is recorded in the name of `shamlat deh hasab paimana malkiat'. In the column of cultivation it is recorded as `makbuja malkan'. The break-up of the l
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top