SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2681

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Ved Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Mahender – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Rajiv Kataria, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J.

1. This is the second appeal filed by the defendant No. 1 in the suit challenging the concurrent judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby, the suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff has been decreed.

2. For the reference, the parties in the present appeal would be referred to as plaintiff and defendants; as they were described in the original suit.

3. The brief facts of the case as mentioned in the suit are that the plaintiff filed a suit claiming that defendant-Sh. Singhram, now represented through legal representatives, entered into an agreement to sell dated 17.11.1990 to the effect that he was the owner in possession of land measuring 1200 sq. yards comprised in Khasra No. 758 situated within the revenue estate of Village Nathupur Tehsil and District Gurgaon. It was further claimed by him that land is free from all sorts of encumbrances. Believing the representation made by the vendor/defendant, the plaintiff agreed to purchase the said property. The price of the land was settled at rate of Rs. 150/- per sq. yard and a total consideration for the sale was Rs. 1,80,000/-. Out of that Rs. 1,25,000/-was paid by the plaintiff














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top