SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2720

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
Vijay Parkash – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CWP No. 8482 of 2013
Decided On : 22-12-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Narender Singh, Advocate, K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S.S. Mann, Senior DAG, Haryana, Sandeep Moudgill, Advocate.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court dismissed the writ petitions as the matter had already been decided in an earlier petition, and a pending appeal provided a recourse for the petitioners.

Headnote:

Election Dispute - Cooperative Society - Haryana Cooperative Societies Act, 1984 - Section 28, Article 226/227 of Constitution of India - 1998 Group Housing Scheme - 2001 Group Housing Scheme - FAR of 175% - Managing Committee Election - Board of Administrator - Disqualification under Bye-law 9 - Civil Rights Infringement

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought writs to quash a resolution and direct the election of the Managing Committee of a cooperative society. The society was registered under the Haryana Cooperative Societies Act, 1984. The dispute arose from the election process and membership issues.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners were aggrieved by being debarred from participating in the election and casting their votes. The court dismissed the writ petitions as the matter had already been decided in an earlier petition, and a pending appeal provided a recourse for the petitioners.

Issues: The issues involved the legality of the election process, membership cancellation, and the actions of the Board of Administrator. The court also addressed the maintainability of the writ petition under the Haryana Cooperative Societies Act, 1984.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the matter had already been decided in an earlier petition and a pending appeal provided a recourse for the petitioners. The court also considered the maintainability of the writ petition under the Haryana Cooperative Societies Act, 1984.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions as the matter had already been decided in an earlier petition, and a pending appeal provided a recourse for the petitioners.

JUDGMENT :

DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.

1. By this judgment of mine, two petitions i.e. CWP No.8482 of 2013 and CWP No.8801 of 2013 shall be disposed of as common question of law and facts are involved in both the petitions. However, the facts are being extracted from CWP No.8801 of 2013.

2. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of resolution dated 17.03.2013 (Annexure P-5) and also for direction to respondents to conduct the election of the Managing Committee of respondent-Society amongst the members as per approved L-Form available with respondent No.3 by allowing the petitioners to participate in the election process as they have not incurred any disqualification under the Act/Rules/Bye-laws and as no order of removal has been passed.

3. Briefly, the facts of the case as made out in the present petition are that The New Haryana Officer's Corporative Group Housing Society Ltd., Panchkula was registered vide registration No.255 dated 19.08.1998. The society applied for 3.5 acres of land in the Group Housing Scheme, 1998 for construction of 142 dwelling units. Accordingly, a plot No. G-20, measuring 14162 square meters was allotted by Haryana Urban Development Authority (here-in-after called as 'HUDA') vide letter dated 08.12.1999 in Sector 27, Panchkula. Due to severe earthquake, there was a big crack in the land near Nada Sahib and most of the members decided to withdraw their membership. A request was made by the Society to HUDA to allow them to construct 80 flats on the entire land measuring 14162 square meters, but the request was declined vide letter dated 16.05.2001. The term of the Managing Committee was upto 23.02.2005. After expiry of term of the Managing Committee, new members were enrolled in place of old members as Secretary and President of the Society were authorized to enroll new members as per decision taken in the general house meeting. The strength of the members of the Society was 142. A request was made by the Society for allotment of two acres land for construction of flats for remaining members under the Group Housing Scheme, 2001. An amount of 23,32,800/- was deposited which was 10% of the estimated cost of the land. Earlier allotted plot to the Society in Sector 27 was surrendered prior to allotment of the land i.e. plot No.1, Sector 6 in Mansa Devi Complex measuring 8000 square meters. Because of interim order by this Court, the first, second and third installments of the plot could not be deposited as some of the members withdrew their membership and demanded back their deposited amount. Under aforesaid circumstances, the then Secretary and President enrolled new members but on visiting office of respondent No.3 for submission of revised L-Form, it came to their knowledge that the Society of the petitioners was not in existence as it was already declared defunct along with other 500 societies. An application was made by the office bearers of the Society to the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies (respondent No.3) stating that their Society was never defunct as four installments were deposited with HUDA on 31.08.1998, 23.05.1999, 24.05.1999 and 10.01.2001 towards cost of the plot as demanded.

4. A complaint was filed by the Society before State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana at Panchkula for re-allotment of plot No.1, Sector 6, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula. The request of the Society was accepted and the Society was revived vide order dated 23.07.2003. Thereafter, the revised L-Form of 105 members was approved on 25.08.2004. The Society submitted Revised L-Form for 100 members with the approval of Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies to allow construction of 100 dwelling units for its members with enhanced FAR of 175% under the signature of President and Secretary of the Society. The Society was allowed to enhance the FAR from 150% to 175% and allowed to construct 100 dwelling


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top