SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1815

AMIT RAWAL
Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rubi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Gopal Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondents:Dinesh S. Rawat, Advocate, Sandeep Moudgil, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

AMIT RAWAL, J.

1. The appellant-defendant No.1 is in Regular Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 03.08.2015 rendered by the Lower Appellate Court, whereby, judgment and decree dated 31.07.2014 of the trial Court dismissing the suit, has been modified.

2. It would be apt to give factual matrix of the suit.

3. Plaintiff-respondent No.1 instituted a suit in the month of July, 2008 claiming declaration to the effect that plaintiff is legally entitled to the flat to be constructed by defendant no.2, i.e., The New Haryana Officer Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited, GH-2, Sector 6 MDC, Panchkula in place of defendant no.1/appellant-Narain Singh being bonafide member of the Society being allottee of plot No.GH 2, Sector 6, MDC, Panchkula on the basis of documents, i.e., agreement dated 17.12.2004, registered General Power of Attorney dated 17.12.2004 and Will dated 22.02.2007 against the receipt of Rs. 10,80,000/- by challenging the cancellation of all the documents with a consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining defendant no.1 from alienat





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top