SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1818

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Noor Jahan Alias Kamla – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Karanjit Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1. The present regular second appeal has been filed by the defendant-appellant against the judgment and decree dated 27.07.2015 passed by the Additional District Judge, Rupnagar vide which the judgment and decree dated 25.11.2011 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Anandpur Sahib in Civil Suit No.154 dated 29.07.2003 has been set aside and the suit of plaintiffs-respondents for declaration that they are owners and are entitled to the possession of the suit property by way of demolition of construction and structure found at the site, has been decreed.

2. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the appeal may be noticed. The plaintiffs-respondents were owners of the property in dispute comprised in Khewat No.514, Khatoni No. 620, Khasra no. 547(3-6) situated in Village Hambewal, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, District Rupnagar. The plaintiffs purchased the land measuring 7 Marlas including the suit property being 1/9 share out of the land measuring 3 Kanals 6 Marlas comprised in Khewat No. 514, Khatoni No. 620, Khasra No. 547(3-6) vide registered sale deed dated 24.04.2003 executed by Parshotam, son of Roda. Previou
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top