SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2990

AMIT RAWAL
Manpreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurmail Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. G.S. Saini, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

AMIT RAWAL, J.

1. This order of mine shall dispose of two Civil revisions bearing C.R. No.5662 and 7342 of 2014.

2. C.R. No.5662 is against the order dated 25.7.2014 (Annexure P-1) whereby the plaintiff-petitioner has been called upon to pay the court fee in respect of suit for damages to the tune of Rs.50 lacs for defamation, causing physical-mental harassment, agony and malicious prosecution. C.R. No.7342 of 2014 is against the order dated 25.7.2014 whereby the petitioners have been directed to furnish the surety bond equal to the amount of the suit i.e. Rs.50 lacs on the apprehension that they were leaving India.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in C.R. No.5662 of 2014 submits that the civil suit Annexure P-2 claiming damages to tune of Rs.50 lacs for defamation, causing physical-mental harassment, agony and malicious prosecution by the respondents was instituted based upon the averments that as per tentative value of the suit, accordingly, court fee of Rs.250/- was fixed. However, the trial court on the application moved by the respondents under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC called upon the petitioner to pay the court fee over such amount. In support of hi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top