DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.

1. This is the regular second appeal filed by defendant-appellant- Basant Kaur for setting aside impugned judgment and decree dated 13.12.2011 passed by the trial Court as well as judgment and decree dated 6.1.2015 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sangrur.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case as mentioned in the appeal are that plaintiff-respondents filed a suit against the defendant-appellant for a decree of possession on the grounds that plaintiff No. 1 along with her brother Telu Ram and sister Seeto alias Surjit Kaur were owners of the suit property. Telu Ram and Seeto alias Surjit Kaur have expired and plaintiffs No. 2 and 7 are their legal heirs and they entered into footsteps of Telu Ram and Seeto alias Surjit Kaur and now the plaintiffs have became the owners of the suit property at the spot. The defendants have no right, title or interest with the suit property in any manner. The property of the defendants is adjoining to the suit property and they were threatening to encroach upon the suit property and raised construction over the suit property forcibly, due to which the suit for permanent injunction was filed against the defendants. Said s