SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3227

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Pushpa Rani – Appellant
Versus
Usha Rani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.S. Longia.
For the Respondent: R.S. Longia.

JUDGMENT :

Raj Mohan Singh, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 04.05.2015 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri vide which application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC moved by the defendants for rejection of plaint was disposed of by observing that the plaintiffs are bound to affix ad valorem court fee as per their share according to market value of the suit property at Collector's rate prevailing in the vicinity of the land.

2. Plaintiffs-petitioners filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the decree dated 26.04.1995 passed in Civil Suit No. 166-CS of 23.02.1995 titled as Ashok Kumar v. Lajwanti, passed by the Civil Court and consequential entries on the basis of said civil Court decree were illegal, null and void and were not binding upon the rights of the plaintiff qua the residential house situated within municipal limits of Yamuna Nagar. Permanent injunction was also sought to restrain the defendants from alienating the suit property.

3. Plaintiffs alleged that plaintiff No. 1 is the wife and plaintiffs No. 2 and 3 are real sons of deceased Mangat Ram. Suit property was previously owned and possessed by father-inlaw of p










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top