SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1694

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Manmohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Davinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mandeep S. Sachdev.
For the Respondent: Vikram Anand.

JUDGMENT :

Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.

1. Vide this civil revision petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, order dated 12.2.2014 (Annexure P-9) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar whereby application of the petitioner-defendant for leading additional evidence was dismissed with costs of Rs. 1,000/- is under challenge. Even earlier to the impugned order, application for leading additional evidence preferred by the petitioner-defendant having been dismissed by the lower court was challenged in a similar fashion in this Court wherein vide order of 16.8.2013 accepting plea of the petitioner-defendant that the application resulting in order of 16.4.2013 was not happily drafted as important facts had remained impleaded, had allowed the petitioner-defendant to move a proper application by stating correct position before the lower court.

2. When claim of the petitioner-defendant is that registered Will of 9.5.1994 in his favour needs proof for which he is required to examine Swaran Singh witness to prove signatures of the testator Smt. Haripal Kaur on the Will, stand of the respondent-plaintiff per contra is that relevant witnesses of the Will have



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top