Rajiv Narain Raina, J.

1. Plaintiff Partap Singh Ranga and the husband of the petitioner S.C. Sharma are stated to be friends and are both lawyers. The petitioner states that there was an understanding between the two that Ranga would transfer all his interest in the suit property in favour of the petitioner, wife of S.C. Sharma and would deal with litigation pending with respect to the 20th share of a member of The Gurgaon Scheduled Caste and Vimukt Jaties Cooperative Agriculture Thrift and Credit Society Limited, defendant No. 6, to whom, the suit property was allotted by the Social Welfare Department in a scheme to house members of the Scheduled Caste and Vimukt Jaties. To this end, Partap Singh Ranga entered into an agreement to sell dated 23rd November, 2009 passing on membership rights in the society in favour of the petitioner. But the plaintiff and S.C. Sharma fell apart. It is alleged that Ranga and defendants No. 8 to 10, Brahmjit, Krishan Kumar and Mukesh Kumar were in collusion with each other and the plaintiff sought to withdraw the suit to the prejudice of S.C. Sharma. Ranga instituted a suit in the trial Court at Rewari on 21st December, 2012. The subject ma