S.S.SARON, AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Armin Ra @ Meena – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
S.S. Saron, J.
CRM No. 7692-2014
Heard.
For the reasons, mentioned in the criminal miscellaneous application, delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
CRM stands disposed of, accordingly.
CRA-D-384-DB-2014
This appeal has been filed by the prosecutrix-appellant against the judgment dated 28.11.2013 and order of sentence dated 29.11.2013, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby Paramjit Singh (respondent No. 2) has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short--'IPC'). He has, however, been convicted of the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC. For the said offence under Section 354 IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years, besides, pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.
2. The appellant-prosecutrix prays that her appeal be accepted with costs and Paramjit Singh (respondent No. 2) be convicted and punished of all the charges framed against him; i.e. he be convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC and the sentence of two years
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.