SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 2246

S.S.SARON, AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Armin Ra @ Meena – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Vikas Bali, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

S.S. Saron, J.

CRM No. 7692-2014

Heard.

For the reasons, mentioned in the criminal miscellaneous application, delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

CRM stands disposed of, accordingly.

CRA-D-384-DB-2014

This appeal has been filed by the prosecutrix-appellant against the judgment dated 28.11.2013 and order of sentence dated 29.11.2013, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby Paramjit Singh (respondent No. 2) has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short--'IPC'). He has, however, been convicted of the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC. For the said offence under Section 354 IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years, besides, pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

2. The appellant-prosecutrix prays that her appeal be accepted with costs and Paramjit Singh (respondent No. 2) be convicted and punished of all the charges framed against him; i.e. he be convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC and the sentence of two years













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top