SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2517

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Arun Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :R. Kartikeya, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms.Harpreet K.Athwal, Deputy Advocate General
For The Complainant :Vikas Chatrath, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.

The petitioners seek concession of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.184 dated 11.9.2016, registered under Sections 307, 326, 379B, 324, 325, 341, 506, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Division E, Police Commissionerate, Amritsar.

2. Briefly, it may be noticed that FIR came to be registered on the complaint of one Dr.Krishan Thakur. Allegations are pertaining to an occurrence dated 12.8.2016 and in which the complainant was assaulted and inflicted grievous injuries by Ashwani Mahajan son of Roop Kumar Mahajan as also the present petitioners, namely, Arun Mahajan son of Roop Kumar Mahajan and Savi Mahajan son of Ashwani Mahajan. It was alleged that while the complainant was going along with his wife, he was encircled by the afore-mentioned three persons along with certain others. Lalkara was raised to teach the complainant a lesson for having filed a case against the Mahajans. Insofar as the present petitioners are concerned, the specific attribution is of Arun Mahajan having attacked with a 'Datar' (sharp edged weapon) whi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top