SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2422

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Amit Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Vikas Sharma, for K.S. Malik, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Daya Chaudhary, J.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 09.10.2015 (Annexure P-5) passed by Additional District Judge, Panipat, whereby, the application filed by the respondent under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act, 1955') has been allowed and the petitioner was directed to pay maintenance @ Rs. 10,000/- per month besides litigation expenses to the respondent.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case as made out in the present revision petition are that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with respondent as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 03.02.2013 at Samalkha. Out of said wedlock, one male child was also born on 31.07.2014. Some differences arose between the parties. The petitioner-husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Act, 1955, which was contested by the respondent by way of filing written statement. Along with written statement, the respondent-wife also filed an application for grant of maintenance pendente-lite and litigation expenses for herself and her minor son. Petitioner filed reply to the application and the respondent-wife





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top