Daya Chaudhary, J.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 6.3.2017 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Divison), Rajpura, whereby, an opportunity to cross-examine the handwriting and finger print expert has been treated as nil.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that respondents-plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 3.2.1995. Respondents-plaintiffs filed an application for amendment of the plaint under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC, which was allowed vide order dated 11.1.2017. Written statement to the amended plaint was filed by petitioners-defendants on 16.3.2016 and thereafter replication to the written statement was also filed on 12.5.2016. Issues were framed on 14.7.2016 and the case was fixed for plaintiffs' evidence on 22.7.2016. The handwriting and finger print expert, namely, Sh. R.V. Vashisht was examined by the plaintiffs as PW-9 on 6.1.2017. The petitioners-defendants moved an application for cross-examination of said witness, which was allowed vide order dated 23.1.2017. Said witness came present on 6.1.2017 but he could n