SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, KULDIP SINGH
Vikram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Satish Kumar Mittal, J.
Vikram Singh complainant has filed this revision petition under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act') against the order dated 15.1.2013 (Annexure P-6) passed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, whereby it has been found that on the day of the alleged occurrence, Krishan (respondent No.2 herein) was juvenile in conflict with law, and was to be tried by the Juvenile Justice Board, Panipat.
2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the impugned order.
3. In the present case, an FIR for the offences under Sections 324, 307, 506, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, was registered at Police Station Samalkha, against respondent No.2, his brother Sushil and one Ravinder, for causing injuries dangerous to life to Jasbir (brother of complainant Vikram Singh).
4. It was alleged by complainant Vikram Singh that on the day of occurrence, i.e. on 21.8.2011, at about 7 P.M., when he was working in his fields, accused Ravinder came to him and asked for his motor cycle, to which he refused, due to which accused Ravinder quarreled and ga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.