SHEKHER DHAWAN
Satish Kumar Bhargav – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Shekher Dhawan, J.
Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, 1973 is for quashing of FIR No. 111 dated 21.5.2017, under Section 406, 420 and 306 IPC, registered at Police Station Rama Mandi, District Jalandhar, on the basis of compromise date 4.7.2017 (Annexure P-2).
2. During the course of preliminary hearing, the trial court was directed to record the statement of all the concerned parties, with regard to the genuineness and validity or otherwise of the compromise by this Court.
3. In compliance thereof, report of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar has been received through District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar with statement of parties, in which it has been mentioned that the compromise is genuine and there was no undue influence or coercion from any side
4. The Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in case "Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052" and Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in case "Sube Singh and another v. State of Haryana and another, 2013(4) RCR (Criminal) 102" observed that compounding of offence can be allowed even after conviction during proceedings of the appeal against conviction pending in Session Court and i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.