SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2628

SHEKHER DHAWAN
Satish Kumar Bhargav – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Navkiran Singh
For the Respondent: A.S. Sandhu, Sandeep Arora

JUDGMENT :

Shekher Dhawan, J.

Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, 1973 is for quashing of FIR No. 111 dated 21.5.2017, under Section 406, 420 and 306 IPC, registered at Police Station Rama Mandi, District Jalandhar, on the basis of compromise date 4.7.2017 (Annexure P-2).

2. During the course of preliminary hearing, the trial court was directed to record the statement of all the concerned parties, with regard to the genuineness and validity or otherwise of the compromise by this Court.

3. In compliance thereof, report of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar has been received through District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar with statement of parties, in which it has been mentioned that the compromise is genuine and there was no undue influence or coercion from any side

4. The Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in case "Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052" and Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in case "Sube Singh and another v. State of Haryana and another, 2013(4) RCR (Criminal) 102" observed that compounding of offence can be allowed even after conviction during proceedings of the appeal against conviction pending in Session Court and i






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top