SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3084

AMIT RAWAL
Kamal Maini – Appellant
Versus
Natasha Alias Mona – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Arun Jain, Abhishek Dhull
For the Respondent: Piyush Khanna

JUDGMENT :

Amit Rawal, J.

Petitioner-husband is aggrieved of the impugned order dated 09.03.2015 of Guardian Judge, Ludhiana, whereby, an application seeking interim custody of the child from mother, has been dismissed while according visiting rights.

2. Mr. Arun Jain, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Abhishek Dhull, Advocate submits that marriage between husband and wife, i.e., petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 10.12.2006. On 19.01.2008, a male child, namely, Vivan Maini was born. As per the case set out in a petition under Section 25 of Guardian and Wards Act, originally filed at Ludhiana and thereafter, transferred at Hoshiarpur, when the child was 6 years old, wife along with child left the matrimonial home and started residing at Hoshiarpur. He submits that during the period the child remained at Ludhiana, achieved many accolades as he had participated in all the competitions and stood first, second, in essence had been coming out with flying colours either it be Tricycle Race, Fancy Dress, Hindi and English Poetry, Biscuits Race, Solo Dance, Run for Fun, Alphabet Race, Story Telling, Competition of Best of Waste, Sorting Competition, Clay Modeling, Rabbit Race, C







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top