SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2485

M.M.S.BEDI
Rekha Kara – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shiv Kumar
For the Respondent: Gaurav Jindal, Madan Sandhu, Thakur Ashwani Verma

JUDGMENT :

M.M.S. Bedi, J.

The petitioner is daughter-in-law of respondents No.4 and 5 and wife of respondent No.6. She has sought the quashing of the order dated September 25, 2012, annexure P-2, passed by the Maintenance Tribunal under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007, for short ‘the Act', and order dated January 1, 2013, annexure P-6, passed by the Appellate Tribunal under the Act, directing respondent No.6 to vacate the house owned by the father-in-law of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner has averred that she was married to respondent No.6 on November 30, 2003 and has been residing since then in their matrimonial home bearing No. 733, Sector 23, Faridabad. Husband of the petitioner is a habitual drinker and is in the habit of coming late to the house and used filthy language besides giving her beatings. The petitioner has got a minor son born out of the wedlock with respondent No.6. Respondents No.4 to 6 in connivance with each other wanted to oust the petitioner from the matrimonial house. All the three respondents connived with each other and got filed an application before respondent No.3 under the Act. Said application was forwarded to the Distri






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top