Daya Chaudhary, J.

The present appeal has been filed by the defendant-appellants to challenge the judgments and decrees passed by both the Courts below whereby suit of plaintiff-respondent for declaration with mandatory injunction was partly allowed and the appeal filed by the present appellants was dismissed.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case as made out in the appeal, are that plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for decree of declaration to the effect that she was owner of 1/4th share in the property which was initially owned by her father-in-law Mangal Singh and after his death, said property was inherited by his sons i.e. defendants and one Jagga @ Dharminder, who was husband of the plaintiff-respondent. After the death of said Dharminder @ Jagga, the plaintiff became owner of 1/4th share of the property of said Mangal Singh being the sole legal heir of her deceased-husband. The Claim was also made for decree of mandatory injunction directing the defendants to hand over the possession of the suit property to the plaintiff being legally wedded wife of Dharminder Singh @ Jagga, who inherited 1/4th share in the estate of Mangal Singh.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants sub