JASBIR SINGH, RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Ashok Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, PKL. – Respondent
Jasbir Singh, J.
CM No.17629 of 2012
CM is allowed, as prayed for.
CM No.17630 of 2012
CM is allowed. True copy of order dated 18.10.2012 is taken on record.
CWP No. 21902 of 2011
Petitioners are the unfortunate purchasers of a plot No.9, Sector-7, Panchkula, in an open auction. It is not in dispute that the above-said sale was conducted as per an order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Chandigarh against which no objection was raised by the HUDA authorities. Sale certificate was issued to the petitioners on 4.5.2005 (P-1), a copy of the same was also sent to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 for necessary action. The possession of the said plot was delivered to the petitioners, vide letter dated 14.5.2005 (P-3) issued by the Local Commissioner appointed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal. A request was also sent to the HUDA authorities for transferring the plot in favour of the petitioners on 25.5.2005 (P-4) intimating that the petitioners had paid the entire amount to the Debt Recovery Tribunal. In response to a letter written by the Estate Officer on 7.9.2005, necessary documents were deposited by the petitioners with the Estate Officer vide letter dated 15.9.2005 (P-5). Petitioners ag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.