SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1958

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Gunjan – Appellant
Versus
Gaurav Kumar Bhatia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Tanmoy Gupta
For the Respondent: Abhimanyu Singh

JUDGMENT :

Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.

A petition filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') for grant of maintenance has been allowed vide order dated 1.8.2014 by the District Judge, Family Court, Gurgaon and in terms thereof, the husband, namely, Gaurav Kumar Bhatia has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 7,000/- per month to the wife Smt. Gunjan and 5,000/- per month to the minor son, namely, Krish Bhatia as maintenance from the date of filing of the petition i.e. 2.1.2013.

2. The instant revision petition has been preferred by the wife and minor son seeking enhancement of the maintenance awarded to the tune of Rs. 50,000/- per month and thereby seeking modification of the order dated 1.8.2014 passed by the Family Court, Gurgaon.

3. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard at length and the records of the case have been perused.

4. Facts, which are not in dispute, are that the marriage of petitioner No.1 was solemnized with the respondent on 24.6.2011 at Gurgaon as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. A male child was born out of wedlock on 23.11.2012. Parties have been staying separately since 23.4.2012.

5. Petition under Section 125 of the Code s


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top