SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1854

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
SAZID KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Samrendra Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J.

1. The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.24 dated 23.01.2018 registered under Sections 120-B/406/420 of IPC at Police Station Gurgaon City, District Gurugram and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. The brief facts of this case are that M/s Goel Sales Corporation had filed a complaint under Section 138 read with section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 10.01.2018. It was pleaded in the complaint that one Hasan Ahmed, the State Head, of M/s Astro Suppliers had assured the complainant to get the work of the Distributorship from Bombay Dyeing for District Gurugram. Thereafter, the said Hasan Ahmed met the complainant personally and the complainant had applied for Distributorship along with various documents which were given to Hasan Ahmed. For the above said assurance, Hasan Ahmed had taken money. However, in the mean-time, Hasan Ahmed had also ensured to the complainant the work-orders from the present petitioner firm. In the course of business, the complainant had supplied the ordered item to the accused in the complaint case, which happened to be company as well as its proprietor, the present petitioner. Since the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top