SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1697

JASWANT SINGH
DARSHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AMARJIT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :V.K. Jain, Senior Advocate and L. Malhotra, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

JASWANT SINGH, J.

1. Vide this common order, I shall dispose of both the aforementioned two Civil Revisions as they arise out of common order passed by the learned trial Court dated 25.03.2014, whereby the Court has allowed the applications of the plaintiff for conducting DNA test of plaintiff, defendant no. 1 (petitioner in CR No 2614 of 2014), defendants no 2, 3 and Swaran Kanta (who is petitioner in CR No. 3104 of 2014).

2. In brief facts of the case are that Amarjit Singh @ Surjit Singh @ Kaka Singh alleges himself to be son of Darshan Singh (defendant no. 1) and filed the present suit for declaration before the trial Court to the effect that he is son of Darshan Singh and that Amarjit Singh and Surjit Singh are one and the same person and further that he is entitled to get corrected his father's name as Darshan Singh instead of Darshan Lal in all the documents, certificates etc. A consequential relief of permanent injunction was also sought for restraining defendant no. 1 Darshan Singh from dispossessing and interfering in the possession of the plaintiff in the land measuring 76 Kanals 3 Marlas. As per the case set out by the plaintiff, he is son born out of the wedloc
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top