AMIT RAWAL
INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAVINDER KAUR – Respondent
AMIT RAWAL, J.
1. Present revision petition is directed against the impugned order dated 01.12.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Sangrur whereby an application filed under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint at the instance of defendant No. 2 has been dismissed.
2. It would be in the fitness of things to give brief facts of the matter.
3. Plaintiff-respondent No. 1 instituted a suit claiming declaration to be owner in peaceful possession of the house measuring 489 sq. yards giving the description of the boundaries towards, East, West, North and South, comprising of Khewat no.372/355, 372, khatoni no. 516 khasra nos. 137//6/2min/2-7, 14/2/0-3, 16/1-7, (ii) 398 Sq. yards equivalent to 398/18815 share of land comprising of khewat no. 510/510, 489, khatoni no. 691 to 702 khasra nos.136//9/2min/2-0-6.00, 136//10/2min/0-9-1.50, 11/6-13, 12/1min/19-450, 20/1/4-4,137//17min/4-0, 18/1/0.2, 196//10/2/0-9- 1.50, 136/1min/0-13, 136//10/2/0-1404.40, 136//10/2min/1-16- 1.80,136//10/2min/0-17-6.75, 136//10/2/1-1, 136//9/2/1-18, 10/2min/0-12, 136//9/2min/0-8-3.00,136//12/1min/1-5-7.50, 136//9/2min/1-0, 12/1min/1- 6-6.00, 136//102min/0-10 and (iii) 23 sq yards
United Bank of India, Calcutta Vs. Abhijit Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.