KULDIP SINGH, J.

1. By this single judgment I shall dispose of two revision petition bearing CR-182-2017 and CR- 272-2017. However, for facility of reference, the facts are being taken from CR-182-2017.

2. Impugned in the present revision petition is the order dated 5.1.2016 (Annexure P3) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Samrala, vide which, application for extension of time for recording statement of Sucha Singh through Video Conferencing was declined.

3. Heard.

4. It comes out that Civil Suit between the parties is pending before the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division),Samrala. The matter came up before this Court on the question as to whether Sucha Singh, who is residing at USA, can allow to be examined by way of Video Conferencing. This Court vide order dated 16.10.2015 passed in CR 6571 of 2014 allowed the said prayer stating that the witness can be confronted with the documents with close proximity to the camera. The witness will go to some local authority where such facility is available. Petitioner himself is at liberty to choose a place which shall be a public authority where such facility is available and inform the Court within a period o