KULDIP SINGH, J.

1. Impugned in the present revision petition is the order dated 14.12.2017 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Narnaul, vide which the evidence of the defendants-petitioners was closed by orders. Also impugned the order dated 06.02.2018 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Narnaul, vide which the application filed by the defendants-petitioners for adducing additional evidence was dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the evidence of the defendants-petitioners was closed by orders. Thereafter, an application was filed to adduce additional evidence to produce the copy of pedigree table for the year 1969-70, certified copy of Naksha Abadi village Tigra, in Urdu language of Ahata No. 105, Ghar No. 337 Samvat 1947 BK, certified copy of Khasra Paimise Abadi village Tigra Samvat 1947 BK and translated copies thereof. It is stated that the said documents are necessary for the just disposal of the case.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have also carefully gone through the case file.

4. It comes out that the case was fixed for rebuttal evidence and arguments, when