SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3088

SNEH PRASHAR
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KULDEEP KAUR – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Rajesh K. Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent:Nitin Thatai, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

SNEH PRASHAR, J.

1. The award dated 26.07.2011 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ludhiana (for short, "the Tribunal"), by virtue of which MACT Case No.104 of 02.08.2010 i.e. the claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, "the Act of 1988") filed by Kuldeep Kaur and others (claimants-appellants) was allowed, has given rise to two appeals captioned above, one filed by the insurance company with whom Truck Trailer No.PB-10BY-2191 (hereinafter referred to as "the offending truck trailer") was insured and the other by Kuldeep Kaur and others, the claimants themselves.

2. Precisely, the facts are that on 30.09.2009, when Jai Hind Singh (since deceased) was driving the offending truck trailer, its steering wheel became free and in order to save himself when he jumped out of the vehicle he got entangled in the wheel and suffered injuries and died. Boota Singh, companion of the deceased lodged D.D.R. No.13 on the same day at Police Station Fathehabad (Agra).

3. The widow, sons, daughter and mother (legal representatives) of deceased Jai Hind Singh filed a petition invoking the provisions of Section 163-A of the Act of 1988 claiming













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top