SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1903

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Puran Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kuldeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Bhag Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents:Fateh Saini for Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Raj Mohan Singh, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 08.12.2017 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri vide which the appeal filed by the respondents was allowed thereby setting aside the order dated 23.10.2017 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri.

2. Brief facts are that plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from raising any construction, changing the existing position of land measuring 23 Kanals 6 Marlas as shown in head note of the plaint without getting the land partitioned. Plaintiff alleged that the land as shown in the plaint is jointly owned and possessed by the parties and they were the co-sharers in the land in dispute. The land in question was not partitioned till such time. Plaintiff further alleged that the defendants intended to raise construction on the front portion of Khasra No.9//11/2 which was situated on the road and was a valuable piece of land which was going to be occupied by way of raising construction. The defendants have started digging foundation in Khasra No.18//11/2. The entries of land of cultivation in the nam



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top