SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2683

A.B.CHAUDHARI
SUKHPAL SINGH KHAIRA – Appellant
Versus
JOGA SINGH – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.S. Rai, Sarvshri Gautam Dutt and Abhinav Sood, Advocates
Mr. G.S. Punia, Mr. P.S. Punia, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Adv

JUDGMENT :

A.B. Chaudhari, J.

By these two revision petitions, the three petitioners; namely Sukhpal Singh Khaira, Joga Singh and Manish Kumar, have put to challenge the order dated 31.10.2017 in CRM No.339 of 28.09.2017 in Sessions Case No.289 of 16.09.2015, decided on 31.10.2017.

Facts :-

2. F.I.R. No.35 dated 05.03.2015 under Sections 21/24/25/27/28/29/30 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 25A of the Arms Act and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, was lodged at Police Station Sadar, Jalalabad against eleven accused persons. On 09.03.2015, a Special Investigation Team was constituted, consisting of Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ferozepur, Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka and Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, which investigated the FIR and filed a challan on 06.09.2015 against nine persons, since remaining two persons were declared Proclaimed Offenders and finally one of them was never apprehended. Thus, the trial was held against 10 persons. Thereafter, on 18.11.2016, a supplementary charge-sheet came to be filed

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top