AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, REKHA MITTAL
ASHOK MANCHANDA – Appellant
Versus
ESTATE OFFICER, UT – Respondent
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.
1. Prayer in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing the orders dated 2.5.2011, 5.8.2013, 26.9.2014, 22.3.2013 and 1.5.2014, Annexures P.8, P.10, P.14, P.12 and P.13 respectively passed by the respondent-authorities cancelling the lease in respect of Booth No. 270, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh.
2. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the petition may be noticed. The Chandigarh Administration launched a scheme known as allotment/transfer of built up booth in any Sector on lease/hire purchase basis in Chandigarh. The booth in question was allotted in the name of Shri Narottam Dass son of Shri Amar Nath vide letter of allotment dated 5.5.1993 on lease hold basis for a period of 99 years. Narottam Dass died on 4.1.1997. He during his life time had executed a Will dated 24.9.1993 bequeathing the booth in question to one Jaswant Singh, father of respondent No. 6 - Jagjit Singh. The Estate Officer conducted enquiry through its Tehsildar on 8.4.2002 and found one Raju son of Jaswant Singh to be in possession of the booth in question. A show cause notice dated 7.6.2002 was is
Suraj Lamp and Industries Pvt. Limited v. State of Haryana and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.