SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3008

DARSHAN SINGH
DAVINDER PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NARINDER PAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ashish Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Simranjeet Singh Sarwara, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Darshan Singh, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred against order dated 5.1.2016 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Rajpura, whereby an application moved by the petitioners for staying the execution proceedings during the pendency of the application under Order 9, Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 25.11.2014, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard.

3. This fact is not disputed that the application filed by the petitioners under Order 9, Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 25.11.2014 is still pending. It will not be appropriate to rush with the execution till the decision of that application. So, the execution proceedings pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Rajpura will remain stayed till the decision of the application under Order 9, Rule 13 CPC moved by the petitioners.

4. On the request of learned counsel for the respondents, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the disposal of the application under Order 9, Rule 13 CPC. The same may be decided preferably within five months.

5. The present revision petition stands disposed of.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top