SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3083

DARSHAN SINGH
BALVIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RANJIT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :L.S. Sidhu, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Darshan Singh, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioners-defendants against the order dated 28.09.2015, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Moga, vide which the appeal filed by the petitioners-defendants against the order dated 10.04.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Moga, has been dismissed.

2. Plaintiffs-respondents no.1 and 2 have filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners- defendants from interfering in the exclusive cultivating possession of the plaintiffs over the land measuring 29 Kanals situated within the revenue estate of village Panj Grain Khurd, Tehsil Bhaghapurana, District Moga detailed and described in the head note of the plaint and demolishing and creating any type of hindrance in the common passage marked ABC shown in red colour in the site plan (Annexure-A), illegally, forcibly and without the due course of law. Along with the suit, the plaintiffs-respondents no.1 and 2 also moved an application under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short CPC) for grant of the ad interim injunction.

3. The said application was contested












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top