SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3030

DARSHAN SINGH
BALBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PYAR KAUR – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S.K. Mahajan, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Darshan Singh, J.

The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 05.10.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Amritsar, whereby the appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 04.02.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar, has been dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the status of the parties is being mentioned as in the original suit.

3. Appellant-plaintiff has filed the suit for injunction restraining the defendants from illegally, unlawfully unauthorizedly and forcibly dispossessing him from the suit property bearing house no.10197 also known as L-10, H. No.68/1, measuring 97 Sq. yds, situated at Gali No. 14, Kot Harnam Dass, Abadi, Tirath Pura, Sultanwind Road, Amritsar except in due course of law.

4. As per the case of the appellant-plaintiff, he is residing in properties no.10197 and 10198 for the last 40 years, which are his ancestral properties. His father Albel Singh purchased the property bearing no.10198 and his uncle (Fufa) Rajinder Singh purchased the property in question bearing no.10197 in the year 1958. He migrated to Unite
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top