SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 2096

PARAMJEET SINGH
MAMAN – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (R) – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mohit, Advocate for R.A. Sheoran
For the Respondent:Rajneesh Chadwal, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Paramjeet Singh, J.

Instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for quashing the order dated 08.07.1993 (Annexure P-1) passed by Assistant Collector IInd Grade, Tosham, order dated 18.08.1993 (Annexure P-2) passed by Assistant Collector IInd Grade, Tosham, order dated 06.04.1994 (Annexure P-3) passed by Collector, Sub Division, Tosham, order dated 26.08.1994 (Annexure P-4) passed by Commissioner, Hisar Division, Camp Bhiwani, and order dated 13.02.1995 (Annexure P-6) passed by Financial Commissioner, Haryana.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 08.04.1992 respondent No. 5 - Amar Singh filed an application for partition of land. The case was adjourned to 21.12.1992 and direction was issued to respondent No. 5, who was original applicant before the Assistant Collector IInd Grade, to furnish registered letter and correct addresses of the unserved respondents. However, the order was not complied with and the application was dismissed in default on 21.12.1992. On 01.01.1993 respondent No. 5 moved an application before the Assistant Collector IInd Grade for restoration of the application for partition. Notice in the application for









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top